Zizobet
Promotion details800% Up to £7,800 + 1000 Free Spins + 25% Cashback
Withdrawal time0-1 hrsCard score98%StatusVerifiedMinimum deposit£10
Visit ZizobetBOF Sister Sites
Casino offers to compare separately
Wildies
Promotion detailsWelcome Pack 400% up to £3,200 + 150 FS
Withdrawal time0-24hCard score99%StatusVerifiedMinimum deposit£5
Visit Wildies
Cosmobet
Promotion details750% + Up to £7,000 + 1000 Free Spins + 25% Cashback
Withdrawal time0-InstantCard score98%StatusVerifiedMinimum deposit£5
Visit Cosmobet
Rolletto
Promotion detailsSee current Rolletto offers
Withdrawal timeSee termsCard scoreNot ratedStatusListedMinimum depositSee terms
Visit Rolletto
SlotRoyals
Promotion detailsWelcome Bonus 200% up to £1,700 + 200 FS
Withdrawal time0-24hCard score97%StatusVerifiedMinimum deposit£10
Visit SlotRoyals
WinBeast
Promotion detailsWelcome Pack £5,000 + 500 Free Spins
Withdrawal time0-24hCard score99%StatusVerifiedMinimum deposit£5
Visit WinBeast
Velobet
Promotion details700% + Up to £7,500 + 1000 Free Spins + 25% Cashback
Withdrawal time0-InstantCard score98%StatusVerifiedMinimum deposit£10
Visit Velobet
ShelbyWin
Promotion details€6,000 + 500 Free Spins
Withdrawal time0-12 hrsCard score100%StatusVerifiedMinimum deposit£10
Visit ShelbyWin
Smash Casino
Promotion details600% Up to £10,000 + 25% Cashback
Withdrawal time0-12 hrsCard score98%StatusVerifiedMinimum deposit£5
Visit Smash Casino
Odin Fortune
Promotion detailsWelcome Package 700% + 700 Free Spins up to 4,000 (currency not specified)
Withdrawal time0-12 hrsCard score98%StatusVerifiedMinimum deposit£10
Visit Odin Fortune
Gambiva
Promotion details800% up to €10,000 + 25% Cashback
Withdrawal time0-24hCard score97%StatusVerifiedMinimum deposit£10
Visit Gambiva
LegionBet
Promotion details125% Bonus up to £20,000
Withdrawal time0-4 hrsCard score100%StatusVerifiedMinimum deposit£5
Visit LegionBetBOF sister sites comparison
BOF and Spineazy share an Elite Cyber Services Limited licence entry. BOF’s exact domain showed an expired-domain notice on 6 October 2026.
| Brand | Evidence | How to use it |
|---|---|---|
| BOF | bofcasino.com in the Elite Cyber licence entry | The original brand being researched |
| Spineazy | spineazy.com in the same current entry | Supported same-licence comparison |
| Anglia Bet and Casino Peaches | Earlier coverage; absent from the current row | Historical context, not a verified current shortlist |
| LegionBet and SlotRoyals | Separate packages displayed below | Commercial alternatives, not confirmed Elite Cyber brands |
BOF has a documented Elite Cyber Services connection to Spineazy, but its website currently displays an expired-domain notice.
BOF and Spineazy
The Anjouan register connects BOF and Spineazy under Elite Cyber Services Limited; BOF’s website currently displays an expired-domain notice. The company’s entry puts bofcasino.com and spineazy.com together under licence ALSI-012401013-FI2. Checked on 5 October 2026, that record displayed a valid B2C licence, issued on 11 January 2024 and expiring on 10 January 2027. The register and the website therefore answer different parts of the BOF question.
This gives the relationship answer a named company and two exact domains. It does not depend on matching colours, games or promotions. Spineazy is therefore a supported relationship reference. Its inclusion here is not a confirmation that either site is accepting registrations or that it replaces BOF.
Anglia Bet and Casino Peaches may be familiar names if you have read older BOF coverage. Neither appears in the current Elite Cyber row reviewed here, so keep them in the historical part of the picture rather than giving them the same confirmed current status as Spineazy. That limit cuts both ways: their absence from this particular row does not establish that they have never had a company connection.
What happened when we opened BOF
On 6 October 2026, opening bofcasino.com in a browser led to its /lander page. That page displayed an expired-domain notice and a set of related-search links. It did not display the BOF casino lobby, account form or player terms. This is a direct observation of the exact domain named in the licence record.
That changes the practical reading of the sister-site answer. A register can retain a domain even when its public website is no longer serving the casino. The licence entry is still useful evidence of the company connection, but it is not proof that you can presently use BOF. A parked-domain search link is also not an announced replacement casino.
Spineazy produced a page titled Spin Eazy – Home but no readable body in the same browser check. That leaves its usable product and player terms unconfirmed here. We have no official account-transfer notice to join the two observations together. If you are researching the company, follow the documented pair; if you are looking for a working substitute, do not treat this pair as an availability recommendation.
What connects Spineazy
Spineazy, styled Spin Eazy in its website configuration, provides a second direct company reference: Elite Cyber Services Limited. The public website information names a Belize registration and a Union of Comoros licensing context. That company match supports the regulator entry linking the two domains.
The regulator record is the useful source for the exact licence number and status. Its number ends FI2. Website code can contain old wording or typographical differences, so the comparison above uses the current register rather than silently treating every version of the number as identical.
A company connection is only the beginning of a product comparison. The material accessible for this review did not expose a readable current Spineazy game catalogue, full bonus conditions or cashier limits. We cannot sensibly rank it above BOF for withdrawals, game range or promotional value on that basis. No account was opened and no deposit or withdrawal was tested.
For an existing BOF customer, Spineazy should not be read as an announced replacement service. The licence row names websites; it does not announce a customer migration, shared balance or account recovery process. A common operator and a transfer instruction are different pieces of information.
The company behind the BOF name
A second primary document adds detail to the Elite Cyber connection. The CyberElite business-partner agreement identifies Elite Cyber Services Limited as a Belize company, registration number 177,058, with an address at 123 Barrack Road, Belize City. Its definition of the programme’s websites specifically names bofcasino.com.
This is useful corroboration because it ties the exact BOF domain to the named business. The document also allows other websites to be added to the programme. That broad wording does not name those websites and cannot be turned into a list of additional sisters. Spineazy’s specific connection comes from the regulator entry described above.
The agreement is written for business partners. Its references to accounts, wallets and payments concern that relationship, so they should not be borrowed as BOF player conditions. It supplies company identity; it does not settle a customer’s withdrawal limits, bonus eligibility or access to another brand.
Keep the BOF account separate
The current licence entry does not state that BOF and Spineazy share a login or wallet. Do not assume that entering an existing BOF login at another brand will retrieve its balance or transaction history. Any arrangement for moving an account would need clear instructions from the service handling that account. The shared casino accounts guide explains why a company connection alone cannot answer the login question.
The same limit applies to unfinished offers. A licence row cannot tell you whether a BOF promotion continues at Spineazy, whether a previous BOF registration affects eligibility there or whether verification carries across. These are contractual questions for the relevant brand, not facts supplied by the shared company name.
If you are researching an old BOF balance, retain the original domain, transaction references and correspondence. Spineazy is a supported relationship lead, but the evidence does not establish it as a recovery channel. Do not deposit elsewhere merely to try to unlock an unrelated pending transaction.
The Anjouan entry establishes an Anjouan licensing relationship. It does not provide a UK Gambling Commission authorisation or establish eligibility for a reader in every country. A valid entry is also not a test of the casino experience: it cannot supply a withdrawal-time ranking or promise how a dispute will end.
What the older comparison names show now
Anglia Bet and Casino Peaches need different explanations. In the 6 October browser check, angliabet.com redirected to angliabet.io. The resulting page was titled Angliabet – Online Casino and Sports Betting and displayed navigation for sports, live betting, casino, live casino, mini games and promotions. The address changed, but the visible AngliaBet identity continued.
That is a useful product observation, not fresh ownership evidence. The page did not expose readable company terms in the material retrieved for this review. Its game sections included Top Casino Games, Megaways & Bonus Buy and Top Live Games, but no usable catalogue from which to establish individual titles or providers. A menu label does not prove that a particular game can be opened, nor that a BOF customer can register.
Casino Peaches presented a different result. Opening casinopeaches.com led to its own /lander address and an expired-domain notice, followed by related-search links. The page did not supply casino terms or identify an official successor. Its resemblance to the BOF domain’s present state is an observation about two addresses, not evidence that their accounts were combined or that one business acquired the other.
This is why the older shortlist should not simply be refreshed by changing its date. AngliaBet supplies a visible current brand interface at a redirected address; Casino Peaches supplies a domain-expiry notice; Spineazy supplies the specific current Elite Cyber register connection. They answer three different questions. None of these observations establishes a BOF account-transfer arrangement.
| Name | Observed address result | Relationship conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| BOF | bofcasino.com/lander; expired-domain notice | Elite Cyber register entry remains the company evidence |
| Spineazy | Spin Eazy page title; no readable player terms retrieved | Named beside BOF in the same licence row |
| AngliaBet | .com redirects to .io; product navigation visible | Historical comparison; current common operator not established |
| Casino Peaches | casinopeaches.com/lander; expired-domain notice | Historical comparison; no successor established |
The exact domain is part of the licence answer
The Anjouan certificate verification framework explains what a current verification record is meant to establish: the licensee, licence number, status, approved domains and validity period. For BOF, that means reading Elite Cyber Services Limited together with bofcasino.com and spineazy.com, rather than treating the company name as a licence for any similarly branded address.
The framework directs readers to the public register or certificate QR verification, because an old certificate image may no longer reflect the current position. That fits the distinction seen here: a historical screenshot of a BOF lobby and the present register can both be useful, but they describe different things. Neither substitutes for the current state of the exact account website.
The authority’s domain conditions also require approval for changes to operational addresses. The AngliaBet redirect therefore cannot be inserted into the BOF licence row by inference. A redirect shows where a browser went; a domain approval establishes the address covered by the licence. The two records must be kept separate until the company evidence connects them.
A BOF balance question needs a different route
The current Anjouan player complaint process says an individual dispute starts with the licensed operator, through the complaint function on its interactive site seal. It gives the operator thirty calendar days to investigate and respond, with escalation to an approved independent dispute-resolution provider if the matter remains unresolved. The authority says it does not decide the merits of individual player complaints.
The policy also states submission periods: fourteen calendar days for game-outcome disputes and thirty for account disputes such as payments or bonuses. It excludes complaints from excluded territories and premature escalation. These are the published process rules, not confirmation that a particular old BOF claim qualifies.
BOF’s expired-domain page creates a specific evidence gap: the browser observation did not provide its working player complaint function. This guide therefore cannot give a verified BOF submission route. A link on the parked page, a new casino registration or a Spineazy account is not a substitute for that missing operator process. Keep the date of the original transaction and any previous complaint response attached to the account question.
An approved dispute service is not automatically BOF’s service
Anjouan’s approved ADR directory lists EGIS ADR, Axion ADR, iGaming ADR and CADRE B.V. These are dispute-resolution providers, not BOF sister casinos. Their appearance on an authority list does not identify which one handles Elite Cyber’s customers or guarantee that a particular case will be accepted.
The published provider descriptions distinguish acceptance of a complaint from deciding it. They first require an attempt to resolve the matter with the operator and describe their own grounds for refusing cases. That matters for someone searching “BOF sister sites” because they hope another company will take over an unresolved withdrawal: an ADR listing is a procedural lead, not an account transfer.
The licence conditions say the designated provider’s name and contact details belong in player-facing terms. They also contain a transition provision for existing licensees, with compliance by the next renewal. No readable current BOF terms were retrieved to establish its designation. The useful missing detail is therefore the operator-specific provider, not another generic list of approved organisations.
The directory places the cost of ADR proceedings with the operator. That is separate from a casino deposit: paying into a new sister-site account is not presented as a step in the published dispute process.
Reporting the unavailable process is a separate matter
The authority’s compliance-reporting page distinguishes a regulatory concern from a private payout dispute. Its examples include failure to maintain a compliant complaints process, failure to meet dispute-resolution requirements and misrepresentation of licensing status. Reports go through its official contact form and should identify the operator, explain the concern and include supporting evidence in English.
For BOF, the relevant distinction is between asking who owes an account balance and documenting what the exact licensed domain displayed. The saved browser result establishes an expired-domain notice on 6 October; the register identifies Elite Cyber and its two listed domains. Those are concrete records. They do not, by themselves, establish the reason for the domain’s condition or prove a regulatory breach.
The authority says it assesses whether a report falls within its scope and need not disclose its outcome. A compliance report therefore should not be described as a refund request that the regulator will decide. Keeping those two purposes separate makes the company relationship useful without promising an unavailable recovery service.
LegionBet and SlotRoyals as alternatives
The two packages below differ in more than size. LegionBet pairs a 125% headline with a larger maximum. SlotRoyals pairs 200% with a lower maximum and 200 free spins. The higher percentage and the higher maximum therefore belong to different offers.
To compare them usefully, establish what your intended deposit receives, whether the headline covers several stages and how the spins are allocated. A ceiling is not an immediate credit, and a spin count does not establish the value of the spins or conditions on winnings.
Neither package extends the BOF and Spineazy licence entry. They are separate commercial choices. The useful decision is whether you want the supported company connection or a particular offer elsewhere; one does not answer the other.
Casino offers beyond BOF
If you want another casino to consider, the LegionBet profile provides background for its package alongside SlotRoyals below. These are offer comparisons, not a claim of shared ownership.
| Casino | Welcome package | Offer |
|---|---|---|
| LegionBet | 125% Bonus up to £20,000 | LegionBet |
| SlotRoyals | Welcome Bonus 200% up to £1,700 + 200 FS | SlotRoyals |
Compare the qualifying deposit and offer conditions along with the headline figures. The maximum amount, percentage and free spins describe different parts of a package.
Our view
BOF now has a precise supported sister-site answer: Spineazy, through the current Elite Cyber Services Limited licence entry. The expired-domain notice means this is a company relationship answer, not a current registration recommendation. Keep Anglia Bet and Casino Peaches as historical references pending current corroboration. The relationship is established more clearly than the products: accessible primary material does not yet justify a detailed ranking of the two casinos or claims of shared accounts.
Further details
- Operator information
- Elite Cyber Services Limited: BOF and Spineazy
- Product focus
- BOF casino sister sites and related-brand comparison
- Account information
- Check connected-brand account terms before creating another account.
- Availability
- Check the current brand terms and availability information before registering.
Questions about BOF
What is the documented BOF sister-site connection?
Spineazy is listed with bofcasino.com under Elite Cyber Services Limited in the Anjouan register. This establishes a company/licence connection. BOF’s own domain displayed an expired-domain notice on 6 October 2026, so the relationship is not a recommendation of current availability.
What licence connects BOF and Spineazy?
The checked entry is ALSI-012401013-FI2, a B2C licence shown as valid on 5 October 2026, with an expiry date of 10 January 2027.
What happened to Anglia Bet and Casino Peaches in the comparison?
They were named in earlier coverage but are absent from the current Elite Cyber entry reviewed here. That makes them historical references, not equally confirmed current sisters.
Can I use my BOF balance at Spineazy?
A shared wallet or transfer arrangement is not established by the licence entry. Keep the BOF transaction with its original account unless the service provides specific instructions.
Does the shared licence mean identical promotions?
No identical promotion or eligibility arrangement is established. A shared licence does not supply the terms of a particular offer.
Are LegionBet and SlotRoyals also listed under that licence?
They are not the two domains in the checked Elite Cyber row. They appear here as separate commercial offer comparisons.