LuckyPays Sister Sites

LuckyPays and the current company trail

LuckyPays’ licence validation names 3-102-937894 Limitada; Fast Slots’ official terms name that same company, and the Anjouan register connects PJ Spins with the exact entity. Those documents give you specific relationships to examine, rather than another recycled list attributed to EOD Code SRL. Keep their different licensing scopes in view as you read: the references come from separate documents, even though they point to the same named company.

The LuckyPays Tobique validation checked on 5 October 2026 listed www.luckypays.io. That individual seal did not list a second domain. Further company research supplies the additional connections below; the one-domain seal is not being presented as an exhaustive list of everything the company operates.

EOD Code SRL and an Anjouan licence appear in earlier LuckyPays coverage, but those references do not make the old company and the currently named licensee the same legal entity. The material reviewed establishes neither a transfer date nor a group acquisition. For that reason, Mega Dice and Crypto Casino cannot simply return to the confirmed current family on the strength of an older comparison. Their previous inclusion does not settle today’s relationship.

Fast Slots: a named company match

The official Fast Slots terms identify 3-102-937894 Limitada as the owner and operator, with the same number used as its registration identifier. They give an address in the Escazú area of San José, Costa Rica, and refer to Tobique licence 0000163. This is a specific legal-entity match with the LuckyPays validation, not a similarity inferred from games or design.

The terms were readable in a browser on 6 October 2026. They also list the United Kingdom among restricted territories. Fast Slots therefore belongs in the company explanation here; it is not being offered as a UK registration recommendation. The geographical restriction remains relevant even when a brand appears in a genuine relationship search.

For someone trying to understand LuckyPays’ current company, Fast Slots is the clearest additional operator statement retrieved. Its own customer agreement still applies to its own service. The company match does not announce shared logins, transferable balances or identical promotions between the two brands.

PJ Spins: the same entity, a different licence record

The Anjouan public register provides a second route into the company trail. Its entry for 3-102-937894 Limitada lists pjspins.com under licence ALSI-202601027-FI1, with dates from 15 January 2026 to 14 January 2027. This ties an exact domain to the same named legal entity found in the LuckyPays validation.

The careful description is a company connection documented in a different licence record. It would be inaccurate to move PJ Spins into the LuckyPays Tobique seal or to say that this Anjouan row licenses luckypays.io: it names pjspins.com. A company can appear in more than one regulatory context, and each domain must stay attached to its own evidence.

PJ Spins’ player terms were not readable through the route checked for this review. We therefore do not use it to predict LuckyPays’ payment methods, account rules or promotion eligibility. It strengthens the answer to the company question while leaving the practical product comparison open.

What the Tobique company list adds

The Tobique Gaming Commission’s licence-holder list also names 3-102-937894 Limitada, showing a B2C licence expiry of 26 March 2027 when checked for this review. This is a company-level record. It sits alongside the LuckyPays domain validation rather than replacing it.

Together, the records answer different questions: the holder list identifies the licensed company; the LuckyPays seal identifies the particular domain; Fast Slots’ terms identify that brand’s contracting company; and the Anjouan entry identifies PJ Spins under a separate licence. Reading them in that order produces a small, evidenced relationship picture without pretending that one page supplies a complete corporate portfolio.

The remaining ownership question is narrower than before. We have named-company matches, but no verified beneficial-owner chart or announcement explaining how the earlier EOD Code arrangements relate to the present entity. A shared current company name is useful; inventing the history behind it would add confidence without adding knowledge.

Cards, wallets and crypto

Earlier LuckyPays coverage described Visa, Mastercard, e-wallet and cryptocurrency support. That is a broad list of categories, not a promise that every method is available for every account or both transaction directions. Read the actual cashier relevant to the selected account.

A deposit option and a withdrawal option are different things. The ability to fund an account using a method does not establish that withdrawals use the same route. Before comparing LuckyPays with another casino, identify the full journey rather than simply matching payment logos.

For cryptocurrency, the exact asset and network matter. Two transfer routes using a similar currency label should not be assumed interchangeable. Follow the receiving instructions for the selected account and do not rely on a general review to supply a deposit address or network choice.

Processing time also has more than one stage. A blockchain transfer and the casino’s handling of a withdrawal request are separate parts of the journey. A claim about one does not establish the duration of the other, and this guide does not provide a tested withdrawal-time ranking.

Mega Dice and Crypto Casino can be considered as names in a crypto-focused product comparison. Their appearance here does not guarantee identical payment support, company identity or account terms. A more crypto-led product can differ materially from one offering a broader set of methods.

The current validation is from the Tobique Gaming Commission. It does not establish a UK Gambling Commission authorisation or eligibility in every country. During this review, the current legal page also returned a regional availability notice, so the historical payment categories above should not be read as a promise that a particular reader can register.

A payment method is not a shared account

Using the same card, wallet provider or cryptocurrency at two casinos does not link their player accounts. Those are ways of moving funds, not evidence of common ownership or transferable balances. The account question remains separate from the payment comparison. Our guide to shared casino accounts explains what an explicit shared-login arrangement would need to establish.

If you already have a LuckyPays transaction to resolve, keep the account, amount, currency and reference together. Another casino offering the same currency is not a support route for that transaction. The payment similarity does not make it responsible for the original request.

Promotional eligibility needs the same precision. Some offers distinguish between payment methods, so find out whether the route you intend to use qualifies. A headline package and a compatible deposit method are not enough if the promotion excludes that method or applies additional conditions.

Older company names can also complicate a payment comparison. Use the current terms for the exact destination before treating a historical relationship as a present one. The EOD Code reference is historical here; the current LuckyPays validation names 3-102-937894 Limitada. Neither reference supplies a complete shared-account arrangement.

What the related brand’s cashier guidance actually says

Fast Slots provides a useful example of why the company match must be followed by a separate account comparison. Its published FAQ distinguishes the casino’s processing from the bank’s crediting time: it describes withdrawals as usually instant on its side, with manual review potentially taking up to 24 hours, then allows up to five business days for the bank. These are the brand’s stated timings, not our test results.

That description cannot be reduced to “the whole family pays instantly”. It contains two stages and a review exception before we even consider another casino. LuckyPays’ current terms were unavailable, so there is no like-for-like timing comparison here.

The FAQ also treats the beneficiary’s identity as part of the withdrawal process. A common operator does not make another person’s payment account acceptable. For a relationship search, this is the practical benefit of reading the second brand’s help page: it reveals the actual questions to resolve, while preserving the boundary around what remains unknown at LuckyPays.

Related brands still need their own bonus rules

Fast Slots’ general bonus terms describe 35-times wagering on the bonus amount, a €/$5 maximum bonus-funded bet, no feature buys using bonus funds and a conversion limit of ten times the bonus. They also limit offers by customer, computer, IP address and household. These are Fast Slots rules, included to explain the comparison rather than to supply missing LuckyPays terms.

The game contribution table is particularly instructive: slots contribute fully, table games partly, and some categories do not contribute at all. A player moving between related brands therefore needs more than the company name and a matching welcome percentage. The games they intend to play must fit the selected promotion’s own rules.

None of this establishes a group-wide first-deposit entitlement. If an existing LuckyPays customer were eligible to use another brand, the relevant question would be how that destination defines a new customer. The company connection itself neither grants nor removes that eligibility.

Cashback needs a calculation, not just a percentage

The related brand’s cashback page describes a weekly net-loss calculation, deducting bonuses claimed during the promotional period. It uses a Monday-to-Sunday UTC window, imposes a claim deadline and excludes jackpot contributions from its calculation. It states that the cashback has no wagering requirement. Those mechanics explain the product more usefully than the percentage headline alone.

This gives a concrete comparison point for the separate ShelbyWin and Zizobet packages later on this page. Zizobet’s cashback percentage cannot be ranked fairly against another promotion without matching the calculation period, qualifying losses, deductions and any claim requirement. This guide preserves their headline offers without inventing those missing conditions.

The same caution applies inside the company family. Fast Slots’ cashback rules are not established LuckyPays rules. A shared operator may administer different promotions, so the correct comparison is between the actual selected packages. Treating every cashback label as the same product would hide differences that matter to the reader’s decision.

Company connections and customer data

Fast Slots’ privacy notice discusses group companies as possible joint controllers or processors for services such as IT, customer support and administration. It separately describes external providers, including payment and identity-verification services. This is a more precise picture than assuming every familiar company in the background is another casino owner.

The notice does not supply a named casino portfolio or a shared-login promise. A provision allowing information to be handled for operational purposes is different from a feature allowing customers to use one account at two brands. It also does not establish that a specific LuckyPays document has already been transferred to Fast Slots.

For an existing customer, that distinction keeps the question practical. Ask the service holding the account what information it requires and which company handles the request. Do not assume another brand can retrieve an old statement simply because its terms name the same operator. The public relationship evidence supports the company comparison; access to a particular customer record needs its own answer.

ShelbyWin and Zizobet

The ShelbyWin profile provides a separate brand comparison. Its displayed offer lists a €6,000 package amount and 500 free spins. Zizobet lists an 800% headline, a different maximum, 1,000 free spins and 25% cashback. The different components make it worth reading beyond the larger headline.

For a payment-led search, establish the accepted method and any offer exclusion first. Then work out what the intended deposit receives. A maximum package can involve more than one stage, free spins need an assigned value and eligible games, and cashback needs its own calculation.

These two packages are separate commercial alternatives. They do not confirm a LuckyPays sister relationship or establish that either cashier works in the same way. The product, payment and offer should all fit the comparison you actually want to make.

Casino offers beyond LuckyPays

If you want another casino to consider, compare the packages at ShelbyWin and Zizobet. These are offer comparisons, not a claim of shared ownership.

Compare the qualifying deposit and offer conditions along with the headline figures. The maximum amount, percentage and free spins describe different parts of a package.

Our view

LuckyPays now has a more useful company answer: 3-102-937894 Limitada is named in its validation, Fast Slots’ own terms and a separate Anjouan record for PJ Spins. Those connections are specific enough to discuss, with their different regulatory scope kept clear. They do not establish a shared wallet or a complete group history. ShelbyWin and Zizobet remain independent commercial comparisons; the old EOD Code brand list should not decide the current family.

Continue your comparison

The casino sister-sites directory is useful when you want to start with another named brand. Each profile keeps its company relationship separate from the casino offers beside it.

Sources

LuckyPays website and its linked Tobique licence validation, checked 5 October 2026.